In what way are “auspex” and “a psalm of life” different?
When comparing the two poems “auspex” and “a psalm of life,” it is evident that they each offer unique perspectives on life, death, and the human experience. While both poems touch on similar themes, such as the passage of time and the search for meaning, they do so in distinct ways that set them apart from one another.
“Auspex” by Sylvia Plath delves into the complexities of life and death through the lens of a bird, known as an “auspex,” that is both observer and participant in the cycle of life. The poem explores the dichotomy of existence, with the bird serving as a symbol for the fleeting nature of life and the inevitability of death. Plath’s use of vivid imagery and symbolism creates a haunting and introspective tone that invites readers to contemplate their own mortality.
On the other hand, “A Psalm of Life” by Henry Wadsworth Longfellow takes a more optimistic and motivational approach to the human experience. The poem urges readers to seize the day and live life to the fullest, emphasizing the importance of action and perseverance in the face of adversity. Longfellow’s uplifting message and inspirational tone encourage readers to find purpose and meaning in their lives, despite the inevitability of death.
While both poems address the themes of life, death, and the human experience, they do so in contrasting ways. “Auspex” offers a more somber and introspective view of mortality, while “A Psalm of Life” inspires hope and encourages readers to embrace life with vigor and determination. Ultimately, the differences in tone, imagery, and message between the two poems highlight the complexity of the human experience and the multitude of ways in which individuals can interpret and navigate the world around them.